TalentShare

Platform · HR and workforce planning

HR and workforce planning

See what expertise you have, what future work requires and where the gaps are. Use that picture for workforce planning, organisational change and role design.

View examples

Use cases

Three questions for HR and leadership

Use a shared skills vocabulary. For example, use CompetentNL, ESCO or your own role framework.

01

Strategic workforce planning

Start with the work ahead. Which activities will grow or change? See how many people in each team can use the most important skills independently. Then decide where to develop people, move talent internally or recruit.

Explore the approach
02

People due diligence

In an acquisition, merger or restructuring, explore which expertise is needed to keep work running. Look at where expertise is concentrated, which roles are difficult to hand over and where teams can complement each other. Turn those insights into plans for knowledge transfer and development.

View the team dashboardView the 3,000 FTE example
03

Current and target role profiles

Document what a role requires today and what tasks and skills it will need in the future. Compare the current and target role profiles before applying them to the team. This shows which role requirements change and what that means for development and staffing.

View example

Strategic workforce planning

Turn future work requirements into workforce decisions

Compare how much capacity you need with the skills the work requires. Use both to decide where to develop people, move talent internally or recruit.

01

Translate plans into work

Choose a planning horizon, such as the next twelve months. Identify which work will grow, change or decline in each unit. Translate that into both the capacity and the skills needed to do the work well.

02

Check available capacity and expertise

Check what capacity is actually available and who can use critical skills independently. Consider expected departures, available time and expertise held by just one person. A skill in a profile alone does not show how much time someone has to use it.

03

Compare scenarios and agree on actions

Compare a base case with a scenario such as faster growth or a delayed system transition. For each gap, decide what mix of learning, internal moves and hiring is feasible. Agree who owns each action and when to review the assumptions.

Example at 3,000 FTE

In the example, total staffing stays the same. Two units need 100 FTE more in total, while the target for two other units falls by 100 FTE. At the same time, 42 colleagues can plan across projects independently and 75 are needed. Check separately how much work people can take on through internal moves and how many can develop that skill in time.

View the figures for the 3,000 FTE example

Fictional dashboard

People due diligence at a glance

Two project teams are merging. Before the transition, HR checks whether the combined team can keep critical work running and where handovers or development are needed.

Coverage

2/4

skills below target coverage

Concentration of expertise

1

skill held by just one colleague

Missing expertise

1

skill nobody can use independently

Expertise by team · number of colleagues who can use each skill independently
Critical skillTeam ATeam BCurrent · combinedTarget · requiredStatusNext action
Capacity planning3254Meets targetAgree on one way of working across both teams.
Project reporting0112Depends on one colleagueHave a colleague shadow the work and deliver a report independently.
Project handovers1122Meets targetCheck that both teams can take over each other’s project files.
Using the new planning system0002No coverageSchedule training and a practical test before the transition.

Counts show proficiency per skill. One colleague can appear under several skills. When planning next steps, also check availability and recent hands-on experience.

Fictional organisation-wide scenario

People due diligence across 3,000 FTE

An organisation is redistributing work across four units. Total staffing stays at 3,000 FTE, while the capacity and expertise each unit needs changes.

Total staffing

3,000 FTE

Current and target staffing are equal in this scenario.

Additional staffing needed

100 FTE

Operations and Projects and engineering need more capacity.

Expertise below target

2/3

Two of the three critical skills need more colleagues who can apply them independently.

Staffing by unit · in FTE
UnitCurrentTargetDifference · target minus current
Operations1,4501,510+60
Projects and engineering700740+40
Service and maintenance550490-60
Corporate and support300260-40
Total3,0003,0000
Critical skills · number of colleagues able to use each skill independently
SkillCurrentRequiredStill neededTraining candidatesAvg. matchTo train for this gapStill needed after training
Capacity planning across projects4275332482%249
Analyse project reports78110323586%320
Carry out quality checks1101050––00

The staffing table counts FTE. The skills table counts people per skill. One colleague may appear in multiple rows.

Training and match figures are illustrative. The average match shows how many relevant entry skills the training candidates already meet, as a percentage. The remaining gap assumes that the colleagues trained can demonstrate independent proficiency after training. A dash means no candidates were mapped because the target is already met.

What should you check next?

Start by identifying how new priorities are changing the work and what that means for service delivery. Then discuss which employees would like to take on different tasks or roles and what skills they already bring. This helps you see where internal moves are possible and where training, knowledge transfer or targeted hiring is needed.

Fictional role example

How the project planner role changes

After two project teams merge, the project planner will schedule work across multiple projects. This comparison shows which role requirements change and what you can do to prepare for the transition.

Role comparison · Project planner
AreaCurrent profileTarget profilePossible action
Schedule workCreates a weekly schedule for one project.Coordinates people and equipment across multiple projects.Practise building a shared capacity plan.
Use project dataRecords progress in an individual overview.Reads a shared dashboard and flags deviations.Use the dashboard in the weekly project meeting.
Organise handoversHands over work when absent.Documents decisions and processes so a colleague can take over.Have a second colleague shadow the work and test the handover.

Turn the gap into a workforce decision

For each new role requirement, discuss who can already use the skill, who wants to learn it and who can provide support. Record what you can develop internally and where you need outside expertise.

Get started

Where would you like to start?

Tell us what you’re working on. In a demo, we’ll show how you can tackle it with TalentShare.